Connect with us

Wikipedia

Mining the Depths of Wikipedia on Instagram

Published

on

Did you recognize that theres a Swiss political celebration devoted to opposing using PowerPoint? That some individuals think Avril Lavigne passed away in 2003 as well as was changed by a look-alike? Or that theres a rock in a gallery in Taiwan that uncannily appears like a piece of meat?

Most Likely not unless, that is, youre among the thousands of hundreds of individuals that adhere to@depthsofwikipedia The Instagram account shares peculiar as well as shocking bits from the substantial, crowdsourced online encyclopedia, consisting of entertaining pictures (a chicken literally crossing a road) as well as small minutes in background (Mitt Romney driving several hours with his dog atop his car). Some blog posts are wholesome such as Hatsuyume, the Japanese word for ones initially desire for the year while others are not secure for job (claim, panda porn).

Annie Rauwerda, 22, began the account in the very early days of the pandemic, when others were cooking sourdough bread as well as finding out just how to weaved. Everybody was beginning tasks, as well as this was my task, she claimed.

At the time, she was a student at the College of Michigan. Trainees are typically dissuaded from utilizing Wikipedia as a resource in scholastic job, due to the fact that most of its pages can be modified by anybody as well as might have incorrect info. However, For Ms. Rauwerda, the website was constantly extra concerning home entertainment: costs hrs clicking one web link after one more, obtaining shed in bunny openings.

Wikipedia is the very best point on the net, Ms. Rauwerda claimed in a phone meeting. Its what the net was expected to be. It has this cyberpunk values of interacting as well as making something.

Initially, just her good friends were adhering to the account. However it obtained a wave of interest when Ms. Rauwerda published concerning the influencer Caroline Calloway, that was distressed that the post included an old variation of her Wikipedia web page that claimed her profession was absolutely nothing. Ms. Rauwerda said sorry, as well as Ms. Calloway later on enhanced the account on her Instagram.

Ms. Rauwerda has actually given that broadened @depthsofwikipedia to Twitter as well as TikTok. She markets goods (such as a coffee cup decorated with a picture from the Wikipedia access for bisexual illumination) as well as has actually organized an online program in Manhattan, including facts as well as stand-up.

Her fans typically pitch her Wikipedia web pages to function, yet nowadays its difficult to discover an access that will certainly thrill Ms. Rauwerda. If its an enjoyable reality thats gotten on the Reddit web page, Im absolutely not mosting likely to repost it, she claimed. For instance, there are just 25 blimps on the planet. Ive learnt about that for a long period of time, as well as it walked around Twitter a pair days earlier. I was stunned. I resembled, Everybody recognizes this.

She is picky in big component due to the fact that most of her fans depend on @depthsofwikipedia for uncovering the covert treasures of the net.

I simply enjoy to find out things, particularly these weird images as well as points I might never ever discover on my very own, claimed Gabe Hockett, 15, a senior high school pupil in Minneapolis. He claimed his preferred blog posts from the account consist of The Most Unwanted Song as well as the Dave Matthews Band Chicago River incident.

Jen Fox, 22, claimed that trading blog posts from the account with her guy is an unique, unpopular love language. Its likewise been a base test for relationships. When Ms. Fox, a copywriter, transferred to San Francisco in February, she would certainly point out the account to brand-new individuals she fulfilled. If they knew with it, she claimed, we would certainly begin DM-ing each various other as well as sharing our preferred blog posts, which seemed like we were actually strengthening a concrete relationship. Ms. Fox also went to a @depthsofwikipedia meet-up at a regional brewery. Theres such a neighborhood behind it, she claimed.

Its not brand-new for fans of Wikipedia to rally around their interest for the system. A Facebook team called Cool Freaks Wikipedia Club, started 8 years earlier, has almost 50,000 participants that proactively trade web links.

Ms. Rauwerdas account makes the net really feel smaller sized, claimed Heather Woods, an assistant teacher of unsupported claims as well as modern technology at Kansas State College. It shortcuts the rabbit-hole sensation by using eye-catching or often happily unsightly access indicate internet society.

Zachary McCune, the brand name supervisor for the Wikimedia Structure, which runs Wikipedia, claimed that @depthsofwikipedia is an expansion of the websites participatory values. Its a location where Wikipedia revives, like an after-hours excursion of the very best of Wikipedia, Mr. McCune claimed.

As Well As due to the fact that Wikipedia has greater than 55 million write-ups, having an overview like Ms. Rauwerda is useful. She wishes that site visitors to her web page leave with brand-new shared expertise. I desire you to see something that makes you stop briefly as well as go, Hmm, thats fascinating, Ms. Rauwerda claimed. Something that makes you reassess the globe a little.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Appointments and Executive Changes

Maryana Iskander, Wikipedia’s Next Leader, on Preventing Misinformation

Published

on

By

Two decades ago, Wikipedia arrived on the scene as a quirky online project that aimed to crowdsource and document all of human knowledge and history in real time. Skeptics worried that much of the site would include unreliable information, and frequently pointed out mistakes.

But now, the online encyclopedia is often cited as a place that, on balance, helps combat false and misleading information spreading elsewhere.

Last week, the Wikimedia Foundation, the group that oversees Wikipedia, announced that Maryana Iskander, a social entrepreneur in South Africa who has worked for years in nonprofits tackling youth unemployment and womens rights, will become its chief executive in January.

We spoke with her about her vision for the group and how the organization works to prevent false and misleading information on its sites and around the web.

Give us a sense of your direction and vision for Wikimedia, especially in such a fraught information landscape and in this polarized world.

There are a few core principles of Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedia, that I think are important starting points. Its an online encyclopedia. Its not trying to be anything else. Its certainly not trying to be a traditional social media platform in any way. It has a structure that is led by volunteer editors. And as you may know, the foundation has no editorial control. This is very much a user-led community, which we support and enable.

The lessons to learn from, not just with what were doing but how we continue to iterate and improve, start with this idea of radical transparency. Everything on Wikipedia is cited. Its debated on our talk pages. So even when people may have different points of view, those debates are public and transparent, and in some cases really allow for the right kind of back and forth. I think thats the need in such a polarized society you have to make space for the back and forth. But how do you do that in a way thats transparent and ultimately leads to a better product and better information?

And the last thing that Ill say is, you know, this is a community of extremely humble and honest people. As we look to the future, how do we build on those attributes in terms of what this platform can continue to offer society and provide free access to knowledge? How do we make sure that we are reaching the full diversity of humanity in terms of who is invited to participate, who is written about? How are we really making sure that our collective efforts reflect more of the global south, reflect more women and reflect the diversity of human knowledge, to be more reflective of reality?

What is your take on how Wikipedia fits into the widespread problem of disinformation online?

Many of the core attributes of this platform are very different than some of the traditional social media platforms. If you take misinformation around Covid, the Wikimedia Foundation entered into a partnership with the World Health Organization. A group of volunteers came together around what was called WikiProject Medicine, which is focused on medical content and creating articles that then are very carefully monitored because these are the kinds of topics that you want to be mindful around misinformation.

Another example is that the foundation put together a task force ahead of the U.S. elections, again, trying to be very proactive. [The task force supported 56,000 volunteer editors watching and monitoring key election pages.] And the fact that there were only 33 reversions on the main U.S. election page was an example of how to be very focused on key topics where misinformation poses real risks.

Then another example that I just think is really cool is theres a podcast called The World According to Wikipedia. And on one of the episodes, theres a volunteer who is interviewed, and she really has made it her job to be one of the main watchers of the climate change pages.

We have tech that alerts these editors when changes are made to any of the pages so they can go see what the changes are. If theres a risk that, actually, misinformation may be creeping in, theres an opportunity to temporarily lock a page. Nobody wants to do that unless its absolutely necessary. The climate change example is useful because the talk pages behind that have massive debate. Our editor is saying: Lets have the debate. But this is a page Im watching and monitoring carefully.

One big debate that is currently happening on these social media platforms is this issue of the censorship of information. There are people who claim that biased views take precedence on these platforms and that more conservative views are taken down. As you think about how to handle these debates once youre at the head of Wikipedia, how do you make judgment calls with this happening in the background?

For me, whats been inspiring about this organization and these communities is that there are core pillars that were established on Day 1 in setting up Wikipedia. One of them is this idea of presenting information with a neutral point of view, and that neutrality requires understanding all sides and all perspectives.

Its what I was saying earlier: Have the debates on talk pages on the side, but then come to an informed, documented, verifiable citable kind of conclusion on the articles. I think this is a core principle that, again, could potentially offer something to others to learn from.

Having come from a progressive organization fighting for womens rights, have you thought much about misinformers weaponizing your background to say it may influence the calls you make about what is allowed on Wikipedia?

I would say two things. I would say that the really relevant aspects of the work that Ive done in the past is volunteer-led movements, which is probably a lot harder than others might think, and that I played a really operational role in understanding how to build systems, build culture and build processes that I think are going to be relevant for an organization and a set of communities that are trying to increase their scale and reach.

The second thing that I would say is, again, Ive been on my own learning journey and invite you to be on a learning journey with me. How I choose to be in the world is that we interact with others with an assumption of good faith and that we engage in respectful and civilized ways. That doesnt mean other people are going to do that. But I think that we have to hold on to that as an aspiration and as a way to, you know, be the change that we want to see in the world as well.

When I was in college, I would do a lot of my research on Wikipedia, and some of my professors would say, You know, thats not a legitimate source. But I still used it all the time. I wondered if you had any thoughts about that!

I think now most professors admit that they sneak onto Wikipedia as well to look for things!

You know, were celebrating the 20th year of Wikipedia this year. On the one hand, here was this thing that I think people mocked and said wouldnt go anywhere. And its now become legitimately the most referenced source in all of human history. I can tell you just from my own conversations with academics that the narrative around the sources on Wikipedia and using Wikipedia has changed.

Continue Reading

Trending

%d bloggers like this: